Skip to content
LandGrantIQ

Home/Indiana

IN rule pack

Right-of-way and eminent domain acquisition in Indiana.

Indiana runs on a prescribed form and a hard waiting period. The offer must be in the form set out at IC 32-24-1-5(c), served personally or by certified mail, at least 30 days before a complaint is filed. Indiana does not strictly require a pre-offer appraisal: IC 32-24-1-3(c)(2) allows an appraisal or other evidence used to establish the proposed purchase price.

What the Indiana rule pack does

Deadlines derived per parcel

The pack turns Indiana procedural requirements into concrete dates and required steps on each tract, so the clock is visible before a date slips rather than after.

Every rule carries its citation

Each requirement traces back to the statute it came from, and each pack is versioned, so you can see which version of the rules a parcel was worked under.

Counsel approves before it goes out

Offers, notices, and filings route to attorneys through review gates. The platform prepares the work; counsel decides what is sent.

A record built as you work

Every offer, notice, appraisal, and approval lands in the audit trail as it happens, so each parcel carries a complete binder if the taking heads to condemnation.

Indiana: what the statute actually says

The offer is on a prescribed form

Indiana does not require a pre-offer appraisal. The effort to purchase must include establishing a proposed purchase price, conducting good faith negotiations, and giving the owner an appraisal or other evidence used to establish that price.

What is prescribed is the offer itself. IC 32-24-1-5(c) sets out a mandatory form, the Uniform Property or Easement Acquisition Offer, and the offer must be served personally or by certified mail at least 30 days before a complaint is filed. If service fails, notice may be published twice, the second publication at least 7 and not more than 21 days after the first.

  • IC 32-24-1-3(c)
  • IC 32-24-1-5(a), (b), (c)

Easement scope now has to match the pleaded need

On April 20, 2026 the Court of Appeals of Indiana decided two cases the same day, both reversing, both against the same condemnor.

In each, the complaint established a need for a water line, but the easement description swept in rights related to sanitary sewer, gas, and other regulated utility service. The court held that the condemnor failed to establish a need for those additional uses, that the trial court should have sustained the landowners' objections to the scope of the easement sought, and it reversed the orders of appropriation that followed from overruling them.

The operative phrase is that the easement description exceeded the pleaded need by incorporating rights for which the condemnor alleged no present or prospective need. Practically, one generic easement template can no longer run across a whole project. Each take has to be scoped to, and documented against, the need actually pleaded.

  • Lingle v. Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC, No. 25A-PL-1898 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2026)
  • Bahler v. Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC, No. 25A-PL-1922 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2026)
  • IC 32-24-1-8(a)(2)

A new notice step for municipal water and wastewater extensions

Senate Enrolled Act 6, Public Law 65, was signed on March 4, 2026. Before a municipally owned utility may condemn land to extend a water or wastewater main located outside the municipality's corporate boundaries or the utility's existing service territory, it must give written notice by mail to every landowner whose land is needed and to the county plan commission, and post project information on its own website while the county posts it on the county's.

A landowner or plan commission that receives one of those notices may request a meeting in writing within 30 days, and the utility must then offer to meet within 30 days of receiving the request. That is a new step in front of a process that already carried a 30-day floor before a complaint could be filed.

  • Ind. P.L. 65-2026 (SEA 6), signed March 4, 2026

Statutes the Indiana pack is built on

  • IC 32-24
  • Ind. Const. Art. I §21
  • IC 32-24-1-3
  • IC 32-24-1-5
  • IC 32-24-1-6
  • IC 32-24-1-11
  • IC 32-24-4-4

This page is not legal advice. It describes what the Indiana rule pack tracks inside LandGrantIQ, and it summarizes published statutes and decisions with the source attached so you can read them yourself. It does not tell you what any of it requires of your project, it is no substitute for your own counsel's judgment, and no part of it creates an attorney-client relationship. Filings always require attorney review and approval.

Running a Indiana project now?

We onboard a limited number of pilot partners at a time, on live projects in the 200–500 parcel range. Tell us the route and the timeline.

Plan a pilot