01
No shared operating picture
Parcel status, owner contact, offers, budgets, and next actions drift across spreadsheets, inboxes, GIS exports, and vendor reports.
Enterprise right-of-way acquisition
Move every parcel forward. Keep every decision defensible.
LandGrantIQ gives infrastructure owners, engineering and ROW firms, and counsel one controlled workflow for parcel status, statutory deadlines, approvals, documents, and evidence.
- Texas & Indiana rule packs
- Counsel approval stays in control
- 200–500 parcel pilot scope
- Measured executive readout
Illustrative pilot workspace
West Segment · Project control
432
Parcels
17
Due in 14 days
6
Counsel reviews
98%
Binder ready
Route exception view
Prioritized by next action
Offer ready · 81Negotiating · 44Exceptions · 9
Counsel gate
6 pendingTX-1842
Initial offer
Due today
TX-1907
Final notice
Source checked
TX-2014
Filing packet
Binder 100%
Illustrative interface. Values shown are not customer results.
Built for regulated infrastructure delivery
- Infrastructure owners
- Engineering & ROW firms
- Land & project teams
- In-house & outside counsel
The operating risk
The project moves across firms. The record should not fracture at every handoff.
Linear land programs depend on owner teams, agents, engineers, specialists, and counsel working from the same facts—without giving up role boundaries or accountability.
02
Rules become tribal knowledge
Jurisdiction-specific prerequisites and notice periods depend on who remembers the process—and whether the latest version reached every team.
03
The record is rebuilt too late
When a parcel moves toward condemnation, counsel has to reconstruct the story from scattered documents, approvals, and correspondence.
The operating model
One control layer from route plan to defensible record.
LandGrantIQ connects the four things enterprise land programs cannot afford to separate: portfolio visibility, jurisdiction rules, controlled handoffs, and evidence.
Portfolio control
01See what is moving, what is blocked, and what needs attention.
Projects, tracts, owners, negotiations, budgets, deadlines, and risk live in one operating view—from the route level to the parcel record.
- Project and parcel status
- Route and map context
- Negotiation and budget visibility
Rules into work
02Turn jurisdiction requirements into accountable next steps.
Versioned, citation-backed rule packs derive dates and required actions per parcel, so teams can work the process instead of interpreting it from scratch.
- Statutory deadline engine
- Citation and rule-version traceability
- Texas and Indiana rule packs
Controlled handoffs
03Keep delivery teams moving while counsel stays in control.
Role-scoped work queues and approval gates connect agents, project leaders, landowners, and counsel without blurring who may review or authorize legal work.
- Counsel approval gates
- Landowner intake and e-sign
- Role-based access
Evidence by default
04Build the defensible record while the work happens.
Documents, actions, approvals, and rule context stay attached to the parcel, producing a counsel-ready binder for closing, audit, or filing review.
- Managed document templates
- Tamper-evident audit history
- Binder completeness tracking
Enterprise control
Designed for the questions that arrive after the demo.
A serious pilot has to satisfy operations, legal, IT, and procurement. The experience makes authority, sources, access, and evidence visible instead of asking buyers to trust a black box.
Counsel remains the decision-maker
AI and workflow automation prepare work. Offers, notices, and filings remain subject to attorney review and approval.
Every requirement keeps its source
Derived deadlines and recommendations retain statutory citations and the rule-pack version used at the time.
Access follows the work
Tenant-scoped, role-based access separates organizations and limits users to the projects, parcels, and actions they are authorized to handle.
The audit trail is designed to be checked
Actions and approvals create a tamper-evident history that can be verified and carried into the parcel binder.
Built around the program
One project record. Different responsibilities.
The platform connects organizations without pretending every participant should see, decide, or approve the same things.
Infrastructure owners
Utilities, pipeline operators, and fiber builders that need portfolio visibility across high-volume, schedule-sensitive land programs.
Control schedule and risk across the full route.
Engineering & ROW services firms
Program delivery teams coordinating clients, agents, specialists, and counsel across projects, offices, and jurisdictions.
Run a repeatable delivery model without flattening client-specific controls.
Land & project teams
ROW directors, land managers, project executives, and agents who need an accountable next action on every parcel.
Manage exceptions instead of reconciling status reports.
In-house & outside counsel
Legal teams that need controlled approvals, cited requirements, clean privilege boundaries, and a record ready for scrutiny.
Review decisions with the source, version, and evidence attached.
Measured pilot
Prove the operating model on a real project.
Start with defined scope, governance, and a baseline. Finish with evidence and a decision—not a vague promise to “drive adoption.”
- ≥30%
- faster pre-petition settlements
- Measured against the customer's own baseline on comparable projects.
- Zero
- missed statutory deadlines
- Every jurisdictional date derived from the rule pack and tracked per parcel.
- 100%
- binder completeness
- Every offer, notice, appraisal, and approval present and retrievable at filing.
These are pilot targets agreed at the start—not results already achieved. Pilot partners are named only with permission.
- 1
Scope the project
Choose a live 200–500 parcel project, the states in scope, the participating teams, and the baseline we will measure against.
- 2
Configure the controls
Map roles, approval gates, rule packs, templates, and reporting expectations before project work moves into the platform.
- 3
Run with governance
Use recurring operating reviews to resolve exceptions, monitor adoption, and keep the pilot inside its agreed legal and data boundaries.
- 4
Read out the value
Review the agreed targets, workflow evidence, implementation lessons, and a clear expand, adjust, or stop decision.
Jurisdiction coverage
Rule packs shipping today.
Each pack is versioned and citation-backed, keeping the source beside the requirement and the derived date.
TX rule pack
Texas
Texas requires a Landowner's Bill of Rights, an appraisal-based pre-condemnation offer, and good-faith negotiation before a petition, and it provides for deposit-and-possession quick take.
Review coverage and citations →IN rule pack
Indiana
Indiana requires an appraisal-based pre-condemnation offer, good-faith negotiation, and — for many condemnors — an authorizing resolution from the city or town council or county commissioners.
Review coverage and citations →Evaluation questions
What buying teams ask before a pilot.
Bring the hard questions to the first working session. We would rather define the boundary than hide it behind a demo.
Which states does LandGrantIQ support?
Texas and Indiana at launch, with additional states to follow. Each state ships as a versioned rule pack with statutory citations so requirements remain traceable.
Does LandGrantIQ replace our attorneys or make legal decisions?
No. LandGrantIQ is built around counsel-in-the-loop review. AI and workflow automation prepare and organize the work; attorneys review and approve offers, notices, and filings before they go out.
What does implementation require from our team?
A pilot begins by defining the project, parcel scope, users, roles, approval gates, templates, rule packs, and success baseline. That working session also surfaces data, security, and governance requirements before configuration begins.
How is project data handled?
Project data is covered by the platform's security and data-processing terms. Access is tenant- and role-scoped, and actions against a parcel are recorded in its audit history. Security and DPA materials are linked below for review.
What does a pilot look like?
Pilots are scoped around a live project, typically 200–500 parcels, and run for roughly three months. The teams agree the workflow, governance, baseline, and success targets before work begins, then finish with an executive readout and an explicit expand, adjust, or stop decision.
How is it priced?
Pilot pricing is set per project based on parcel count, states, and implementation scope. We discuss that in the first working session; there is no public per-seat price that ignores project complexity.
Start with the project
Bring us the route, the states, and the operating constraint.
We will use the first working session to determine whether LandGrantIQ fits, what a controlled pilot would require, and where it should stop.